Pacific Lumber Poised to Log Ancient Redwoods Adjacent to Avenue of the Giants

[ bach home | newsletter | updates | press releases | email list | links ]
updates /

Logging Plan Borders Humboldt Redwoods State Park, Highway 101

Humboldt County, CA - Signs dotting Northern California's stretch of Highway 101 near the town of Red Crest declare the scenic passage the "Redwood Highway", named for ancient redwoods that tower over its flanks. Passing through Humboldt Redwoods State Park, which contains one of the largest remaining contiguous stands of ancient coast redwoods in the world, lengths of the famous thoroughfare are just a stone's throw to ancient forest owned by Maxxam/Pacific Lumber -redwoods they plan to cut down in the coming weeks.

The 65-acre Timber Harvest Plan (1-04-220 HUM) is habitat for the endangered marbled murrelet and contains many giant redwoods, including some over 10 feet in diameter. Due to its close proximity to the park, the plan has drawn criticism from the Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR), which sent a dissenting "letter of non-concurrence" to the California Department of Forestry (CDF), the agency responsible for approving the plan. The denuded hillside would create a visual blight to passengers on Hwy 101, as well as those on Avenue of the Giants within the State Park.

DPR also cited a procedural oversight in which they were excluded from an inspection that evaluated visual impacts of the logging operation. It was only through a personal communication with a CDF staff forester and related documents that DPR learned of the inspection. In this location, the removal of old growth redwoods cannot be visually mitigated.

Humboldt Redwoods State Park has suffered environmental damage in recent years, including giant redwoods that toppled when erosion from upstream logging on PL property undercut the banks of Bear Creek. Bear Creek lies just a quarter mile from the proposed harvest area.

Further criticism of the logging plan came from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. After reviewing the proposed logging plan, and the "impaired condition of the water courses in the plan area, the Water Board "determined that additional protection is needed to comply with water protection laws. The Regional Water Board staff has the responsibility and expertise to protect "beneficial uses of water", but they say the plan falls short

Approval of the plan would also expose visitors to Humboldt Redwoods State Park to the noise pollution of a full-scale industrial logging operation of ancient redwood forest. The explosive sound of a 1,500 year-old tree hitting the ground would damper a peaceful autumn hike through the woods. The resulting aftermath from the cutting of new roads on steep slopes holds great erosion threats to the Parkland and watershed as well.

Public comment period ends soon!


The deadline for public comment is midnight on November 5. Below are key points, followed by a sample letter. Use the points in a letter of your own, or use/edit the sample language. Comments can be snail-mailed or emailed, but must be sent very soon!
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
POINTS:
This plan should be denied because it


*is not in compliance with the Basin Plan, according to the Regional Water Quality agency
*proposes significant new road building on steep slopes, certain to cause erosion in a watershed already listed as impaired
*does not provide adequate protection for an EPA-listed impaired watershed
*proposes tree felling and cable yarding in winter conditions, very likely to cause significant sediment delivery to nearby watercourses, in violation of the Basin Plan
*adds to the cumulative impacts already suffered by nearby watersheds (low Eel River and Horse Coller watersheds) from previous logging by PL

============================

California Department of Forestry
Attn: Forest Practice
135 Ridgeway Avenue
Santa Rosa, CA95401
santarosapubliccomment@fire.ca.gov

THP 1-04-220 HUM

To who it may concern,

THP 04-220 must not be approved, as it will contribute significant adverse cumulative effects. The proposed mitigation in the THP is not sufficient to evaluate or meaningfully address these cumulative impacts.

The Eel River is severely impacted by previous harvest operations and is subsequently listed by the EPA as an impaired Watershed. The Eel River provides many beneficial uses that are protected with conservation laws. This protection must be upheld by the reviewing agencies, including CDF, that have a responsibility to assess potential damages to these beneficial uses.

Previously harvested plans adjacent to the proposed THP area will escalate the cumulative adverse impacts and would hinder the recovery of the already impaired watershed.

The THP proposes 3,400 feet of new road construction on a steep ridgeline that drains toward watercourses. This would only add to the already significant cumulative effects of sediment discharge into the Eel River.

According to the Regional Water Quality Control Board, this plan is not in compliance with the Basin Plan. It must be brought into compliance with these standards before approval can be considered.

This Plan is located in an already significantly impaired watershed where harvesting steep areas within close proximity of the riparian area is inappropriate. The sediment generated from such a plan will have a negative effect on water quality in general and will commit trespass of sediment damaging and degrading downstream property including Humboldt Redwoods State Park.

I do not agree with Fortuna CDF's recommendation for approval and the accompanying statement that "no significant unmitigated cumulative effects are likely to occur as a result of this THP.

Humboldt Redwoods State Park protects one of the largest remaining contiguous stand of Old Growth Coast Redwoods and its preservation is valued by citizens the world wide. Execution of this THP will visually and environmentally degrade Humboldt Redwoods State Park, damages for which the park and is visitors will not be compensated. The benefits gained by the county from tourism will be diminished, and simultaneously the county would be stuck with the bill for any potential catastrophes (i.e. the Stafford landslide, only four miles Northwest of the proposed THP).

The proposed plan is of great concern due to its location on a steep (up to 100% slope) hillside that exhibits unstable geologic features above US Highway 101. The close proximity of the plan creates health and safety concerns for motorists traveling the highway below.

Please include this comment in the official file for THP 1-04-220 HUM.

Respectfully submitted,
YOUR NAME HERE
YOUR ADDRESS OR EMAIL HERE
--




More Updates



updates /

[ bach home | newsletter | updates | press releases | email list | links ]